There wasn't much of a variance to my feedback in that they all pretty much stated the same thing. However, a lot of it was positive in regards to the data and my analysis of it. Since I didn't have to go out and collect the data, because it was provided by you, I am able to do a more thorough analysis of it. I have the time to really sit and compare studios and find trends within the data. As I stated during my presentation, I did not have a main question that I wanted to answer. Maybe it was because my tactic was opposite of everyone else's that they were unable to help much with that part, I don't know. I just know that I was kind of left off where I started, without much advice on how to move forward.
Although I didn't get much help in the way of my essential question, at least I know I am on some kind of track. My data was clear and showed obvious signs of trends. I was able to deduce which majors were visiting the digital studio, for which projects, using which programs, and even in some cases, for which professors. In some of my feedback, people raised questions about what this means for the digital studio and for the students-- that is the question I am essentially trying to answer. Other feedback were about my question in regards to why we don't see a lot of returning students. The only returning students that I was able to find were those who were working on a post card research project with a professor. I think that this may be part of the larger question that I want to answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment